Talk:Battle of An Ninh

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 17 July 2015 by reviewer MatthewVanitas (talk · contribs).

Vietnam B‑class Low‑importance

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / Southeast Asia B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

B

This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Southeast Asian military history task force

Result in Infobox

Latest comment: 5 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

The result was stable from 11 October 2017 when I cleaned up the page from its previous mélange until 13 June 2018 when banned user User:A bicyclette made this edit [1] in May 2019 I fixed the result again by this edit [2] and it has been stable until 25 July 2019 when IP 1.43.12.127 changed it again [3], I reverted then User:Carnivourous123 changed it: [4], I reverted then another IP 123.25.82.115 changed it again: [5], these IPs and Carnivourous123 are presumably related. Indecisive is an incorrect result, it was a US victory as explained in Aftermath, however it occurred Mztourist (talk) 03:32, 30 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Indecisive is right. "Tactical and strategic disaster" (as the source says) is definitely not a "victory" in English. 129.78.56.148 (talk) 06:22, 3 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Westmoreland said it was a victory and the body count shows it was a tactical victory, how that was achieved by landing in a VC base is irrelevant. Mztourist (talk) 07:24, 4 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Well that's what you say not the sources. The source doesn't even assess anything based on body count or the "landing in a VC base". Stick to the sources. 1.43.12.127 (talk) 13:21, 4 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Read the Aftermath section, that's what the sources say. Mztourist (talk) 03:48, 5 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic