Talk:Bart's Comet/GA1
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Music2611 in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS): 
- In the plot section, shouldn't it be "Anticipating this, Ned builts..." instead of "Ned built" since the section is written in a different time.
Also in the plot section, I think the second time you mention the weather balloon, you should refer to it as "Skinner's weather balloon", since it is only briefly mentioned in the beginning of the section.
In the production section, Grampa, Jasper and Database should all be wikilinked and properly disambugated.
In the Cultural References section, when do the townspeople sing que sera sera (and perhaps, who wrote/performed the song originally).
- In the plot section, shouldn't it be "Anticipating this, Ned builts..." instead of "Ned built" since the section is written in a different time.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Per MOS:IMAGE, the image of John Swartzwelder be moved to the right.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- If the above issues can be taken care of, than I'll pass the article. Good Luck.--Music26/11 20:17, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
Okay I've made these changes, except for the Swartzwelder image because when it's right alligned it screws up the page format. Gran2 10:27, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
- Almost ready, as for the image, I don't really get what you mean when you say it screws up the page format. However, if it can't be moved to the right it should either be placed some sentences lower or removed from the page.
- Actually, the MOS says Do not place left-aligned images directly below a subsection-level heading (=== or lower), as this sometimes disconnects the heading from the text that follows it. This image is not directly below a subsection-level heading. —TheLeftorium 15:25, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
- Crap, you're right, I'm terribly sorry for the mistake. I'll pass the article.--Music26/11 17:04, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, the MOS says Do not place left-aligned images directly below a subsection-level heading (=== or lower), as this sometimes disconnects the heading from the text that follows it. This image is not directly below a subsection-level heading. —TheLeftorium 15:25, 2 January 2009 (UTC)