Talk:Barbican Estate

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Haltendehand in topic WikiProject Social Housing?

WikiProject Social Housing?

edit

Why is this in the WikiProject Social Housing? The Barbican is not and never was social housing and does not belong there. Seeing as the WikiProject's aim is 'To improve and increase the number of articles about social housing projects in the United Kingdom' it seems particularly inappropriate and misleading. Would somebody please remove it or instruct me as to how I can do this myself? Haltendehand (talk) 21:05, 18 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Untitled

edit

The articles on the three towers really dont add anything and just duplicate information. I think we should get rid of them. Justinc 12:22, 16 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Done! Kbthompson 17:39, 11 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Note about listing

edit

The estate was Grade II* listed but can't remember when. We should note this with x-references to english heritage.

Grade II, I think, though there are plans up upgrade it. 86.0.203.120 11:43, 17 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

I put it in GII category, when I added the Golden Lane link. (It was correct in early Oct). It could be explicitly stated in article. When I lived there, some aspects of the interior were listed, mainly the kitchens and the extraordinary sliding windows. Some people had subverted the listing by glazing their balcony. Kbthompson 14:14, 17 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Barbican Estate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:28, 27 October 2016 (UTC)Reply