Talk:Baptists Together

Evangelical Christianity B‑class Mid‑importance

	Evangelical Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Evangelical Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Evangelical Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Evangelical ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject Evangelical ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject Evangelical ChristianityEvangelical Christianity articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity: Baptist Mid‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Baptist work group.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Down-Grade Controversy

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I think something needs to be said regarding the Baptist Union, C.H. Spurgeon and the Down-Grade controversy, or a page be made regarding the controversy —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cloud Stryfe (talk • contribs) 14:40, 30 April 2007 (UTC).Reply

I have added a short section on Michael Taylor with references, and this seems an appropriate place to make this addition. Usually 'downgrade' is unhyphenated. Cpsoper (talk) 21:17, 16 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

14 years later, and I too was surprised to find so little mentioned about the Downgrade Controversy. It is nothing to be ashamed of. While the addition made in 2016 goes some way towards remedying the omission, I have taken the liberty of briefly mentioning it in the main History section where I think it belongs. Feel free to change as required. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.172.173.226 (talk) 12:31, 15 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Baptists Together. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130512231646/http://www.ncvys.org.uk/index.php?page=392 to http://www.ncvys.org.uk/index.php?page=392

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:35, 25 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic