Talk:Baptism of Fire (1943 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.
	This article is supported by the War films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

On 12 January 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to Baptism of Fire (1943 film). The result of the discussion was 1st moved, 2nd not moved.

Requested move 12 January 2024

Latest comment: 10 months ago10 comments10 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: 1st moved, 2nd not moved. (non-admin closure) Hameltion (talk | contribs) 02:31, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

– There are two films with the same name (i.e. this and Baptism of Fire (1952 film)), and there is almost no traffic here. I initially was going to propose moving the dab page to the base title (which I do not oppose as an alternative), but after looking at the traffic of all pages, the novel seems to be overwhelmingly the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. (The WikiNav clickstream for the dab is not cooperating with me.) It is pretty much the only one that gets real traffic. It had a large spike for some reason last year, but after settling, it still consistently gets over 100 hits vice others that maybe get 5 or 7 on a high traffic day. 2pou (talk) 18:52, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Note: WikiProject Film has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:47, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support, this article is clearly not the primary topic, and the article for the novel surpasses all others in average daily pageviews 257 to 3. —El Millo (talk) 23:39, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Support agree the 1943 film isn't primary but perhaps move the DAB to the title case base name like Friendly Fire. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:31, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Support per WP:PFILM. InfiniteNexus (talk) 06:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Support. Also, just to answer why it got the spike in traffic in 2023: the release of the second half of season three of the Netflix series The Witcher, which adapts parts of the novel, released that day. (The spike before that is when the first half of that season dropped.) ~Cheers, Ten Ton Parasol 04:13, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Support first, oppose second there's no primary here given baptism of fire. The Polish fantasy novel Chrzest ognia may have some more hits thanks to a TV tie in but "novel baptism of fire" in Advanced Book Search gets another author. So move Baptism of Fire (disambiguation) to baseline. In ictu oculi (talk) 22:40, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Disambiguate both. Baptism of Fire and Baptism by Fire are ambiguous with Baptism by fire due to being a very famous phrase that is frequently stylised in title case. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:12, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Support first, oppose second per In ictu oculi. --wooden superman 15:33, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic