Talk:Banksiamyces

Banksiamyces has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 22, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 1, 2010.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Banksiamyces is a fungus that grow on the dead "cones" of Banksia species?

Fungi Low‑importance

	Fungi portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Banksiamyces is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Comments

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I have had a shocker of a past few days. Friday turned to ****, and couldn't get to the library (for the Vic Nat article), and the weekend was a dead loss. Hopefully I will get a chance tomorrow....(fingers crossed). The article is looking really good, just a shame I couldn't be more active to date. Casliber (talk · contribs) 09:58, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

That's quite alright, the article's not going anywhere, and I'm sure I can find something to occupy myself with in the meantime :) Now I have to go prep an FAC nom to get in the organism action at FAC. Sasata (talk) 14:17, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Update - got it - wonderful what you can do with a digital SLR camera set to 1600 ISO :) Funny, I think I have corresponded with Kate Sommerville about banksias before. Anyway, I will email Tom May about the violacea photo for an ID too. Now to add some material - it is a fascinating paper BTW. Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:33, 5 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic