Talk:Badeschiff

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

I saw a picture of Badeschiff when reading about things to do in Germany while at the World Cup. I wanted to know more about this public park, but Wikipedia (my usual source for finding out about these things) had no information. I found a couple good articles about it and I have linked to them. It is a pretty major attraction and quite an interesting one, therefore I believe it is worthy of a Wikipedia page. (Aaronsmiller 20:26, 2 June 2006 (UTC) =Aaron)Reply

Converted from ship

edit

The picture doesn't look like it was converted from a ship, more like it was built from scratch. Are we sure about this?. -- Starbois (talk) 21:18, 15 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Badeschiff. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:11, 8 December 2017 (UTC)Reply