Talk:Aylesbury railway station

Rename Aylesbury Town?

At London, they now call this station Aylesbury Town (to distinguish from P'way). Should this be included? Btline (talk) 21:13, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Only if that's the name shown on station signs and timetables --Redrose64 (talk) 18:34, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Last time I travelled by train from Aylesbury it was still just Aylesbury. And that was after Parkway opened. -- role^player 18:59, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Ownership

The ownership of Aylesbury station changed several times prior to Nationalisation. I want to fill in two fields in the infobox, viz. |pregroup= and |postgroup=. The problem is that the station was doubly joint. Prior to Grouping, it was 50% GW & GC Jt, 50% Met & GC Jt, and after Grouping, the same two Joint Committees owned the station. How was it officially described? It's not mentioned in the Railways Act 1921, whilst the Transport Act 1947 has no separate undertaking, but lists "The Great Western and Great Central Railways Joint Committee" and "The Metropolitan and Great Central Joint Committee" in Schedule 3, which also states "any other body whose members consist wholly of, or of representatives of, two or more of the above mentioned bodies", which covers Aylesbury. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:17, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Aylesbury railway station/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Article assessed at Start class. to achieve B class:- It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. = no, but see comments It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. = yes It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. = yes It is free from major grammatical errors. = yes It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams = yes Comments:- references generally are good, mostly through wikilinks. There are two external references in the article. One of these is to a PDF file. It would really be better if these could be converted to in article references, with a refereces section at the bottom of the article, and the reference clearly marked as a PDF file. Also, the Onward connections section needs wikifying. Mjroots (talk) 10:17, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Last edited at 10:17, 27 January 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 08:43, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aylesbury railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080820080811/http://www.railsaver.co.uk/chilternrailway.htm to http://www.railsaver.co.uk/chilternrailway.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:47, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

First mention of a locomotive

A recent addition reads "The first mention of a locomotive at Aylesbury was of the broad-gauge loco Giraffe in 1863, a member of the Sun class." Where was this mentioned? When in 1863 did it occur? What was the occasion? Was it significant, or just an entry in a trainspotter's log book? We need to satisfy WP:V here, as well as WP:NOR.

Why is the engine shed described twice, one of these being in a subsection "Motive Power Depot"? --Redrose64 (talk) 10:50, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Aylesbury railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071008215639/http://www.southeast-ra.gov.uk/southeastplan/key/study_areas/draft_strategies/mkav/aylesbury_vale-draft_strategy.pdf to http://www.southeast-ra.gov.uk/southeastplan/key/study_areas/draft_strategies/mkav/aylesbury_vale-draft_strategy.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080201004717/http://www.eastwestrail.org/ to http://www.eastwestrail.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:43, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Aylesbury railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927050548/http://www.hertsdirect.org/infobase/docs/pdfstore/ltp2railstrat.pdf to http://www.hertsdirect.org/infobase/docs/pdfstore/ltp2railstrat.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080201004717/http://www.eastwestrail.org/ to http://www.eastwestrail.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:07, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Connection to East West Rail cancelled?

I read somewhere (but can't find it again, maybe it was just a forum post?) that the proposed connection to EWR for onward services to Winslow, Bletchley and MKC has been cancelled due to cost overrun in the whole project. Or was it just the dual tracking aspect? There is nothing about it here (but then again there is nothing here about planned future services anyway) or at East West Rail#Developments and announcements for Western section. Can anyone clarify? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 16:46, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

I didn't dream it but it was only a rumour in the Bucks Herald.. Today, TransportXtra has picked it up.. Nothing citeable, of course, but maybe smoke without fire? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 19:35, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

References