Talk:August Wilhelm Schlegel

Latest comment: 10 months ago by 71.168.157.79

Just feel the need to point out that this is one of the most disjointed articles on Wikipedia, and it also relies strangely on 19th-century scholarship. I’m not the one to overhaul it, but someone must. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2fennario (talkcontribs) 19:29, 2 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

If "disjointed" means "having improper or disorderly connections," It is difficult to find the article disjointed. Also, what does "19th-century scholarship" mean?71.168.157.79 (talk) 01:22, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Irksome ToddyReply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on August Wilhelm Schlegel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:05, 17 October 2015 (UTC)Reply