Talk:Aspect weaver
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aspect weaver article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Aspect weaver has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 16, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that using a dynamic aspect weaver has been shown to improve the performance of aspect-oriented software by 26%? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Incomplete sentence
editThe sentence "While traditional optimizations such as the elimination of unused special variables from aspect code can be done during compile-time, some optimizations." Not sure what was intended here. decltype (talk) 07:37, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
- Uh... I'm not sure what happened. I remember that sentence (in full). Either I didn't finish what I was writing or it got removed. I'll see if I can find it in the history. Thanks for pointing that out! --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 16:01, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
- Found it. I incorrectly chopped up a sentence here. Thanks again! --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 16:06, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, I see. decltype (talk) 15:39, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
- Found it. I incorrectly chopped up a sentence here. Thanks again! --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 16:06, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Problem with definition
edit"The advice specifies the exact location and functionality of the injected code." IMHO: "The advice specifies the functionality of the injected code." - it is correct, and "Point cuts specifie exact locations of the injected code." 83.222.41.113 (talk) 16:47, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Aspect weaver. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://wwwx.cs.unc.edu/~lee/docs/pra03-colyer.pdf - Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://kerstens.org/mik/publications/aspectj-ecoop2002.pdf - Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.acs.org.au/documents/public/crpit/CRPITV10Spinczyk.pdf - Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://reference.kfupm.edu.sa/content/s/e/a_semantics_for_advice_and_dynamic_join__97028.pdf - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722194353/http://www.imamu.edu.sa/DContent/IT_Topics/Aspect%20Support%20in%20the%20Design%20Phase.pdf to http://www.imamu.edu.sa/DContent/IT_Topics/Aspect%20Support%20in%20the%20Design%20Phase.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:20, 10 July 2017 (UTC)