Talk:Asian Brazilians

An abridged Japanese Brazilian?

This article is nothing more than a shortened version of the Japanese Brazilian article. There is nothing about the other Asian groups in Brazil, everything is about the Japanese. I don't know if I should sent this article to WP:AFD? Does anyone have a comment or solution about this article? Lehoiberri (talk) 20:10, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Maybe we should keep this article alive. It's important, however, to include Chinese and Koreans in this article, not only the Japanese. Opinoso (talk) 11:35, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

I understand the importance of this article. I think the article should be similar to Asian American. I agree it should mention the Chinese and Koreans, and maybe smaller groups of Asians {instead of making separate pages like Filipino Brazilian}. Lehoiberri (talk) 17:31, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

"Asian Brazilian" vs "Brasileiro Amarelo"

If "Asian Brazilian" includes people of Middle Eastern descent, then it is not the same as "Brasileiro Amarelo" ("Yellow Brazilian"). If "Asian Brazilian" translates into "Brasileiro Amarelo", then it cannot include people of Middle Eastern descent, who are not "Amarelos". Ninguém (talk) 18:54, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Asian Brazilians. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070809004704/http://www1.ibge.gov.br:80/brasil500/home.html to http://www.ibge.gov.br/brasil500/home.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:00, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Asian Brazilians. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070329224947/http://www.adital.com.br/site/noticia.asp?lang=PT to http://www.adital.com.br/site/noticia.asp?lang=PT&cod=23402

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

No improvement to quality of content

As has been discussed above, there has been no improvement to the scope of the article, and [[WP:OR|original research}} as to who is or isn't 'Asian Brazilian' has been added. It still reads as an abridged version of Japanese Brazilians — with a few other groups thrown in to give the impression of a broader scope — held together by throwing in home-spun tales of Romani, Levantine, and other 'guestimate' ethnic groups into the equation. The article is currently beyond unencyclopaedic: it is fabrication and misinformation. I suspect that this is due to be WP:AfDed. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 04:43, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20080506061352/www.asahi.com/english/Herald-asahi/TKY200805030045.htm http://etds.lib.tku.edu.tw/etdservice/view_metadata?etdun=U0002-1706200514550500. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 18:55, 5 October 2021 (UTC)