Talk:Archival science

Libraries Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

History High‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Collections Care (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Collections Care, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Collections CareWikipedia:WikiProject Collections CareTemplate:WikiProject Collections CareCollections Care

Citation issues and additions

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I would like to point out that whoever made previous edits to this article seems to have just copy-pasted their citations if they used information from the same sources multiple times, especially since they did not cite specific page numbers of their article. This has messed up the order of the footnotes, which you can see as you read the article. I am not sure how big of an issue this is and did not want to mess around with this myself, but I'm sure that this could be fixed by going to the source that was referenced and finding the correct pages that the information corresponds to and then editing the citations that were made.

I have also added additional information to the introduction summary, giving the definition of records and the qualities/characteristics that are instrumental to archival science. Additional information was also added to the section on standards detailing how there is no universal stardard that archives follow.

Anon146 (talk) 00:30, 6 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Provenance

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hello!

I would like to add a section on the role of provenance in archival science, and how it relates to the arrangement and description of archival records. I will also briefly trace the history of the concept, and place it in contrast to the historical manuscripts tradition.

Any thoughts on how I should structure this before I post it? Any feedback is much appreciated!

AaronRoussain (talk) 21:30, 16 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Provenance edit

I've gone ahead and published a few sections relating the role and development of provenance within archival science. Please feel free to suggest any changes, or add to this discussion in any way!

AaronRoussain (talk) 17:10, 18 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Preservation edit

I've added a couple sections on preservation as well as reorganized the organizations section and "In General" section.

Katey DblU (talk)

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of Wikipedia supported by WikiProject Wikipedia and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:31, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic