Talk:Anti-Quebec sentiment
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Anti-Quebec sentiment article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was nominated for deletion on September 23, 2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Anti-Quebec sentiment be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Quebec may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Index
|
||||
Maturity of the article
editI think that this article is quite mature and complete, but since it controversial there is a lot of vandalism.
So I believe that it time to provide better protection of the article.
I just Erased two hates comments containing the usual rambling about french canada and Quebec in the talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.202.113.225 (talk) 02:01, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
This article doesn't cover much of Quebec's trangressions
editThis is pretty one sided by making it seem that Quebec is an innocent. There's nothing on Quebec's law banning visible religious minorities from many government jobs. It doesn't cover Bill 96 which involves Quebec's attacks against English institutions. It doesn't cover Quebec's recent efforts to defund Montreal English universities by dramatically raising tuition for non-quebec students and redirecting funds from those schools to French universities. One would think that Quebec is far more of victim than the oppressor and instigator of conflict. In fact there's no mention of the Legault government at all. 174.89.236.175 (talk) 12:05, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- And how do you suggest that this would fit in this article? Are valid complaints about iniquities in Quebec policy instead being couched as axamples of anti-Quebec sentiments? If so then there is a place for it in this article. Having said that, the IP blanking your comments as NOTAFORUM has at least some grounds. Your complaints about Quebec being
the oppressor and instigator of conflict
and notinnocent
are not appropriate. Meters (talk) 04:52, 22 July 2024 (UTC)