Talk:Anoxic depolarization in the brain/Georgia Institute of Technology Introduction to Neuroscience
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Adewale3 in topic Peer Review from Kelli Allen
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Peer Review from Bennettalterman (talk) 05:32, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Bennett Alterman
- Quality of Information: 2
- Article size: 2
- Readability: 2
- Refs: 2
- Links: 2
- Responsive to comments: 2
- Formatting: 1 (No course banner)
- Writing: 2
- Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
- Outstanding: 2
_______________
Total: 19 out of 20
Thanks for catching that. I will definitely put the coourse banner Adewale3 (talk) 02:10, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
1. Quality of Information: 2 2. Article size: 2 3. Readability: 2 4. Refs: 2 5. Links: 2 6. Responsive to comments: 2 7. Formatting: 2 8. Writing: 2 9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page:2 10. Outstanding?: 1
Total 19/20 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roanukz (talk • contribs) 14:58, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Peer Review from Kelli Allen
- Quality of Information: 2
- Article size: 2
- Readability: 2--Well segmented into difference sections. Dense writing but made more accessible.
- Refs: 2
- Links: 2
- Responsive to comments: 2
- Formatting: 1--Extra free lines from the top portion should be removed.
- Writing: 2
- Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
- Outstanding: 1
_______________
Total: 18 out of 20 Kallen35 (talk) 21:43, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
I will narrow the line. THANKS Adewale3 (talk) 02:10, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |