Talk:Ann Gloag
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
Involvement with "Keep the clause"
editBrian Souter's involvement with "Keep the clause" is well reported, but could you cite Ann Gloag's involvement other than hearsay e.g. other than ScotsGay Magazine January 2000 or Spectrezine. Brian Souter is mentioned in the wikiarticle, I have cleared this up. As she is a living person, her religious beliefs are not relevant unless in reference to her upbringing or she has a prominent role within that organisation. Also, "At the turn of the Millenium" besides spelling error, implies that these events were in 2001 when the poll was conducted in 2000. → friedfish 17:09, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- This is a biographical article. Of course her religious stance is important, what's wrong with that? Just about every other major biographical article has some information on someone's upbringing, family religion, current belief etc, this is hardly unusual. "Turn of the Millenium" refers to around that time - 2000 qualifies even with the 2001 definition. Apart from some pedants, few people saw 2001 as the Millenium. They're usually the type of people that going on about how monkeys aren't apes, and dolphins aren't fish - all well and good, and true, but a good way of clearing a room... --MacRusgail 16:16, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Hi, thank you for you input → friedfish 16:39, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Are you anti-gay or something? Personally I couldn't give a toss (no pun intended, and "fur cough", isn't a pun in my accent. We pronounce the "r"). What's with the religious thing anyway? You still haven't answered that.
--MacRusgail 16:38, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations for what you have achieved in West Africa. I know you can well afford it and so can many others who chose not to, but you do not have to do it but you chose to this. God bless you. Jim Orrock —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.192.54.80 (talk) 21:33, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Ann Gloag. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140521012433/http://www.eveningtelegraph.co.uk/news/local/ann-gloag-believes-1-manston-airport-will-take-off-1.142397 to http://www.eveningtelegraph.co.uk/news/local/ann-gloag-believes-1-manston-airport-will-take-off-1.142397%20
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:35, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Pronunciation
editDoes anyone know how to pronounce Gloag? I have heard it said Glow-agg, but rhyming with vogue seems more euphonious. Afterbrunel (talk) 18:56, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Billionaire?
editWhy is she described a billionaire, then two sentences later it is stated that she and her brother were (jointly, presumably?) worth £730 million two or three years ago? £730m is not a billion, especially when the sum is attributed jointly to two parties. 2A01:4C8:1404:20DA:246C:E336:FE8A:FD69 (talk) 00:42, 21 January 2023 (UTC)