 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | On 14 July 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from Anitta (disambiguation) to Anitta. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 14 July 2021
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vpab15 (talk) 21:57, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
– Move dab page to main title. The current primary is not getting the required pageviews; Anitta (singer) is getting 1k+ clicks per day. 162 etc. (talk) 21:06, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Support per nomination. The king from nearly 4000 years ago is not the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. If consensus skews in the direction of merger, I would likewise support merging the three-entry Anitta (disambiguation) page into the all-inclusive Anita disambiguation page, which already contains at least one of the Anitta dab page entries. Anitta would thus become a redirect to Anita. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 22:27, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- Support per nomination. no WP:PRIMARYTOPIC In ictu oculi (talk) 06:51, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- Support the singer has 21,074 compared with 1,038 for the king, the king is probably primary by PT#2 so a DAB is probably the best compromise. Crouch, Swale (talk) 10:47, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 20:09, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- Neutral/Weak support on change to disambiguation page but strong oppose (if someone would come it to mind) primary topić or even base name in disambig for the singer as living person can not beats ancient notable king, this should not be based on what is currently more popular. I can agree with Crouch disambig is reasonable compromise but not with "King is probably primary by #2". Dawid2009 (talk) 18:21, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Dawid2009: PT#2 is WP:PT2, the 2nd criteria of primary topic namely "A topic is primary for a term with respect to long-term significance if it has substantially greater enduring notability and educational value than any other topic associated with that term." which I would suggest the king is but not by the 1st criteria, usage. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:02, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Crouch, Swale:. Oh ok, pardon me. I assumed You mean "king is probably Second the most important topic after the singer". Thanks for claryfing. I agree with You with Second ćriteria of WP:PrimarytopicDawid2009 (talk) 19:07, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.