Talk:Animoog
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Animoog article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Contested deletion
editThis page is not unambiguously promotional, because... it doesn't sounds like an article which would give facts. Instead the lines are almost like an advertising lines we hear, read and see in the media.
Contested deletion
editThis page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --108.1.196.251 (talk) 09:14, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
It is a page about an app, just as there is a page for angry birds and so on.. The content is also plain descriptive..
WikiProject Apps Classifications
edit- I have set the WikiProject Apps notes to 'C' for quality and 'Low' for importance. I believe this 'Low' importance mark is justified because it refers to the importance as an app in the global app ecosystem: from my point of view, Animoog really is for specialists (i.e. mobile device musicians). Feel free to discuss and update these values. I am not the one who added Animoog to the 'WikiProject Apps' group. Cheers Lordsatri (talk) 15:42, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- - I just revised the Musical instrument importance level from Low to Mid. Award-winning Animoog is today essentially confirmed a major milestone as a mobile device professional instrument, with stars such as Suzanne Ciani and Jean-Michel Jarre playing Animoog live as part of their music tours. By quickly comparing the Low and Mid categories, I'd claim it's obvious Animoog should be set to at least Mid (which is where we find the Eigenharp as well). If you disagree with my assessment, no problem, just bring forward arguments for another change! Thanks! -- Lordsatri (talk) 19:08, 12 January 2019 (UTC)