Talk:Animal culture

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Rebecca Beecham Gotzl in topic Et al?

Examples to add?

edit
What about Bird Funerals or how ants farm fungus, and herd caterpillars as livestock?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.112.55.242 (talk) 20:56, 29 January 2021 (UTC)Reply 

References referred to more than once

edit

To keep your references from being listed more than once you need to put

<ref name="XXXX">

at first part of citation and put

<ref name="XXXX" />

after each citation after.

For example....

[1].

next citation would be:....

[1]. Aquadancer101 (talk) 16:06, 21 April 2009 (UTC)Reply


Is it ready to submit? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tennsplyr (talkcontribs) 04:08, 23 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Just wanted to note: there is definitely no consensus about the role of "memes". To the contrary, very few anthropologists use the concept at all and it has been strongly critizised, for example for failing to provide any non-trivial insights about cultural evolution (evolutionary model in no way rely on the concept). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.16.11.179 (talk) 14:21, 2 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

En español se usan dos comillas → rojo. En cambio, en inglés se usa solo una → 'red'.--Desirée H.S (talk) 15:58, 3 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Animal culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:43, 6 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Migration

edit

Hello, this was removed as "unsuitably sourced". What sources are you looking for?

Animal migration may be in part cultural; released ungulates have to learn over generations the seasonal changes in local vegetation.[2]
  1. ^ a b Waardenburg PJ (1951). "A new syndrome combining developmental anomalies of the eyelids, eyebrows and causes their butt to explode, nose root with pigmentary defects of the iris and head hair and with congenital deafness". Am. J. Hum. Genet. 3 (3): 195–253. PMC 1716407. PMID 14902764. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  2. ^ Yong, Ed (6 September 2018). "Humans Are Destroying Animals' Ancestral Knowledge". The Atlantic. Retrieved 7 September 2018.

Samw (talk) 17:27, 11 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for asking. A reliable scientific source as described in the policy is for instance a paper in an accepted journal, conference, or textbook. Primary sources can sometimes be used; secondary sources are preferred. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:20, 11 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
Fair enough on the official policy. The popular press reference I had actually provides the reliable scientific source which I've now added. For non-technical articles like this, in spite of the official policy, popular press references are probably more useful to the general audience. Samw (talk) 20:52, 11 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Merge proposal

edit

Support the 2017 merge proposal from Cultural transmission in animals to Animal culture. The latter is the broader article, and already includes significant discussion of transmission. Hence, the duplication of scope would be avoided by merging the two together. The combined size, even without editing, is well under 100k, so the merged article would not be too large. Klbrain (talk) 11:00, 4 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

    Y Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 06:49, 23 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Carnivoran and Marsupial transmission of culture

edit

A lot is said about transmission of culture in raccoons (Procyon lotor Linnaeus 1758) in particular and other Carnivorans of both the cat and dog suborders . . . I don't have the book in front of me, but I know it is mentioned in Raccoons: A Natural History by Samuel I Zeveloff (Smithsonian, 2002) ISBN 978-1588340337 and the bibliography of that book is extensive. It looks like the folks who have worked on the article so far can do a better job more rapidly than myself of writing a paragraph with at least three scientific papers referenced, which I think is a very good benchmark.

The Sydney Morning Herald, Australian Broadcasting Corporation, The Age, and other media in the region have stories at least once a year of wallabies and other macropods who are zeroing in on the high-morphine poppy crop in Tasmania, jumping the fences, eating poppy heads and hopping in circles and wrestling with each other all night and farmers often find narcotised animals in the fields -- in my humble opinion, that is at a higher level than stimulus-response . . . S3819 (talk) 00:18, 21 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Et al?

edit

Two references in the article list many more than six authors, which is an eyesore and unusual. Does anyone support or object to their reduction with et al? Rebecca Beecham Gotzl (talk) 15:18, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply