Talk:Animal Logic

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Australian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force.

Australia: Cinema Low‑importance

	Australia portal Animal Logic is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Australian cinema task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Animation: Films Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as Low-importance).

In the news

Latest comment: 17 years ago7 comments3 people in discussion

The minor edit warring on this page has been noted outside the Wikipedia. See Pop goes that acting career#Just Wikied from the Sydney Morning Herald.

The Sydney animation and visual effects studio Animal Logic is scrambling to finish the kids' film Happy Feet, directed by George Miller and starring the voices of Nicole Kidman and Hugh Jackman.

But something else was niggling the company this week. A sly battle has been taking place on the Wikipedia website, a free online encyclopedia edited by anyone around the world who has internet access.

This week someone inserted the following paragraph at the end of the otherwise bland entry about the company: "Animal Logic also has a reputation within the Australian market as a company that unfairly works their employees long hours without compensation as required by NSW and Australian industrial relations regulations."

Touche! The paragraph was soon deleted, after which it appeared again, and then disappeared again. When contacted, Animal Logic declined to comment.

The surprising thing is that the paragraph was apparently added by someone from within Animal Logic, unless their servers are open proxies. See this edit from 203.94.168.166 (talk · contribs), which and rDNS shows as mail.al.com.au, the mail server for Animal Logic Pty Ltd. ^Blank ^Verse 06:00, 1 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

why is that surprising? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 210.55.0.200 (talk • contribs).

Because the vast majority of corporations monitor internet usage. For example, it is highly likely that the system administrators at http://wetafx.co.nz/ (aka Weta Digital Ltd./Weta Workshop Ltd.) have records of who made the edit from the IP 210.55.0.200. ^Blank ^Verse 10:02, 5 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

as an ex systems administrator of animal logic, I would say they are probably more occupied just trying to get what needs to be done to keep the buisness operating rather than tracking users internet access. I see that the original message was removed because it was classes as "slanderous", isnt truth considered a reasonable defense. It is generally accepted in the australian market that animal logic is not a pleasant place to work.--Bedel23 22:03, 10 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

If you can cite a reference from a responsible source, such as a major newspaper or business journal, then it is something that can be included. Unsourced rumours, however, get deleted. [User:BlankVerse|^Blank]]^Verse 07:25, 11 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

by virtue of that logic it can be added from the citation above?--Bedel23 04:46, 20 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

No. The quote at the top of this section is basically a bit of gossip without any substantive backing for the information. The Sydney Morning Herald is a generally reliable source of information, but the column the quote is from, however, is not. ^Blank ^Verse 08:27, 20 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

I think that it is quite crude for anyone to say that a company is not a good place to work. Even if you are employed there, maybe you just didn't get along well with the other employees. Animal must not have been too bad when they kept about 450 employees during the making of Happy Feet... Banno kun 06:18, 1 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Animal Logic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:46, 14 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Animal Logic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:28, 6 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic