Talk:André-Joseph Léonard

Neutral point of view

Large sections of this article now read more like a party indictment of Leonard than an objective biography, full of argumentative speculation. See for example the paragraph under "Initial Reception" - "Did Rome anticipate these negative reactions? They must have foreseen them, if they paid attention to the terna, the list of three names of possible successors Karl-Josef Rauber, the papal nuncio, put together in 2008, after the usual consultations of Belgian church and state leaders, and sent to Rome. They must certainly have foreseen them when Léonard’s name was not on the second terna, which Rauber put together after the first had been rejected by Rome." If such speculation is to be included, it needs to be quoted in a primary source, and attributed. Remember: "The tone of Wikipedia articles should be impartial, neither endorsing nor rejecting a particular point of view." Likewise, I question the inclusion of the entire "Temperament" section, something I can hardly recall being done in other well moderated biographies of this sort in Wiki. Alexander1926 (talk) 14:35, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Vandalism

Be aware that this page needs to be protected from vandals somehow. I am not neutral and will refrain from editing the page in question since the wiki page on vandalism just confused me when I tried to figure out how to flag the page for it.Pär Larsson 03:26, 23 November 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Parl2001 (talk • contribs)

Primate of Belgium section

A half-sentence with no end leads me to believe that this section was edited by someone in haste, whether warranted or not I do not know. Being an inexperienced editor and not neutral I don't see it as my place to revert or try to figure out what should or shouldn't be in that section. Help, please? Pär Larsson (talk) 04:23, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on André-Joseph Léonard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110728135853/http://press.catholica.va/news_services/bulletin/news/25795.php?index=25795&lang=en to http://press.catholica.va/news_services/bulletin/news/25795.php?index=25795&lang=en
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110707233427/http://www.bhcourier.com/article/World_News/World_News/Belgiums_Catholic_primate_faces_homophobia_charge/72363 to http://www.bhcourier.com/article/World_News/World_News/Belgiums_Catholic_primate_faces_homophobia_charge/72363
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.telemoustique.be/newsletter/data/leglise_et_les_belges.pdf
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://diocesedenamur.be/default.asp?X=8FB1E9D505667E78626275616D0B0B06016C

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:05, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on André-Joseph Léonard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.rcfnamur.be/default.asp?X=68B9A868F3767561040B0406001076746204090704071676706104080405051374797808040603137F730D040103EF
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120808201435/http://press.catholica.va/news_services/bulletin/news/26652.php?index=26652&lang=en to http://press.catholica.va/news_services/bulletin/news/26652.php?index=26652&lang=en
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://blogs.telemoustique.be/blogs/2007/04/le_debat_continue_voici_les_ex.asp
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://diocesedenamur.be/default.asp?X=8FB1E9D505667E78626275616D0B0B06016C

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:03, 5 July 2017 (UTC)