Talk:An Inconvenient Truth...Or Convenient Fiction?

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Redxiv in topic Reception

On the availability of the film

edit

The original film website no longer exists and the Internet Archive doesn't display it. I added a link to PRI's bookstore which it seems is the only place that still carries it. It was never copyrighted officially but I believe it still falls under intellectual copyright laws. There is a six part youtube version that I added to the external links but it's commented out until someone verifies copyright or gets a release from [PRI] or [Steven Hayward]. Zephalis (talk) 21:50, 10 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on An Inconvenient Truth...Or Convenient Fiction?. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:11, 4 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Reception

edit

The reception section is pretty one-sided. Was this film seen only by climate change deniers? (Who loved it, of course.) --Hob Gadling (talk) 06:45, 21 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

The reception section also opens with authoritatively describing it as "the film sharing the inconsistencies of actual events when compared to the predictions of the Gore film" before getting into the reviews, thus treating that description as if it's an established fact rather than a reviewer's opinion. — Red XIV (talk) 14:12, 31 July 2023 (UTC)Reply