Talk:Amory Street station
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Theleekycauldron in topic Did you know nomination
 | Amory Street station has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 7, 2022. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Amory Street station and Babcock Street station replaced four predecessor stations? | |||||||||
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Amory Street station article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 09:45, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- ... that Amory Street station and Babcock Street station replaced four predecessor stations? Source: Comm. Ave. Green Line Improvements Public Meeting (This more recent source, cited later in the article, also supports the hook and specifically names the new stations.)
Improved to Good Article status by Pi.1415926535 (talk). Self-nominated at 03:03, 23 January 2022 (UTC).
- @Pi.1415926535:
Both articles reached GA status within a week, long enough, neutral and no copyvio obvious. Several sources are behind paywalls or offline, and are accepted AGF. The hook is interesting and referenced. All pictures are free. You'll need to do one more QPQ since you are nominating two articles at once. Corachow (talk) 20:48, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Corachow: I wasn't sure if that was still the case - it isn't in the QPQ instructions - but I also reviewed Abraham Wolf. Thanks, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:51, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Per WP:DYKSG#H4, I think you need QPQs for each article you're nominating. Thanks for providing another QPQ. Corachow (talk) 20:59, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Corachow: I wasn't sure if that was still the case - it isn't in the QPQ instructions - but I also reviewed Abraham Wolf. Thanks, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:51, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
