Talk:Amir Hamzah

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Amir Hamzah/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tim riley (talk · contribs) 12:45, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Beginning first read-through. More soonest. Tim riley (talk) 12:45, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

• Thanks muchly. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:07, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Review

What a very sad story! I felt quite downcast as I read through the article.

I don't propose to hang about over this one. The article plainly meets all the GA criteria, in my view. There are a few minor drafting points I'd get pernickety about if this were a candidate for FA but the prose far exceeds the GA criterion "reasonably well written". The justification for the single non-free image is explained. To my layman's eye there is nothing omitted, and the balance is good. There is copious citation of a good range of sources. I see no reason to delay.

If you decide to go on to FAC please tell me, and if perchance you want my tiny quibbles before FAC, let me know and I'll add them to the article talk page.

GA

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Well, that was easy. If only all GA candidates were likewise! Tim riley (talk)

Indeed! Thanks for the review Tim.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:47, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Amir Hamzah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/64D6W7NlP?url=http://pusatbahasa.kemdiknas.go.id/lamanv42/?q=detail_tokoh%2F661 to http://pusatbahasa.kemdiknas.go.id/lamanv42/?q=detail_tokoh%2F661

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:31, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Amir Hamzah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6JuI0DJQE?url=http://www.tempo.co/read/news/2010/06/28/161259138/Puisi-Amir-Hamzah-Bukan-Sastra-Sufi to http://www.tempo.co/read/news/2010/06/28/161259138/Puisi-Amir-Hamzah-Bukan-Sastra-Sufi

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:54, 20 January 2018 (UTC)