Talk:Amanda Vanstone

Possible Wiki Links

I am currently testing an automated Wikipedia link suggester. Ran it on this article, here are the results:

• Can link the Opposition: ...ing politics. Vanstone was a member of the Opposition Shadow Ministry from 1987 to 1988...
• Can link service delivery: ...nment pensions and welfare system whose service delivery agency, Centrelink, is a frequent t...

Notes: The article text has not been changed in any way; Some of these links may be wrong, some may be right; You can leave positive feedback or negative feedback; Please feel free to delete this section from the talk page. -- Nickj 08:35, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Poltical position within the Liberal Party

Senator Vanstone is a "moderate" within the Liberal party; some would even call her a "wet". The article should mention this.

Maybe we should also make the point that John Howard has more than once appointed a moderate to a Cabinet position where he or she has to be the public face of an unpopular or controversial policy (eg., putting Ruddock in charge of Migration). Chris Chittleborough 12:42, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

This kind of stuff is inevitably a matter of opinion and therefore cannot be stated as fact. The best way to approach it is to quote someone else as saying it. You could write: "Michelle Grattan wrote in The Age "Senator Vanstone is a "moderate" within the Liberal party; some would even call her a "wet"." This avoids debate about whether the statement is true or not, since Grattan is saying it, not you. Adam 15:23, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

Quite true. I guess I just volunteered to do some Googling. Chris Chittleborough 07:31, 11 September 2005 (UTC)

Having just found this in an old to-do list, I'm now un-volunteering; I'll save my energy for other articles I care more about. Anyone else care to have a go? Chris Chittleborough 10:11, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Her dropping from the Ministry makes her faction even less important, so no :) That said, I don't think Vanstone or Ruddock would fit the definition of 'moderate' these days. Perhaps ten years ago, but neither has shown any stomach for moderate policies in more recent times. Ruddock especially is now a classic right-winger. Jeendan 11:30, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Implication in forced abortion

It's interesting that she signed the order for Zhu Quing Ping to be returned to China, even though she knew that the pregnant woman's baby would be aborted. Sure enough, at eight month's into the pregnancy, the Chinese authorities forced the woman to abort her baby. http://melindatankardreist.com/2010/08/%E2%80%98they-kill-her-baby-and-they-make-her-suffer%E2%80%99-horror-stories-from-china/ - 114.76.227.0 (talk) 12:43, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Amanda Vanstone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080811122802/http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/pubs/pops/pop34/c14.htm to http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/pubs/pops/pop34/c14.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110605092156/http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=113709 to http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=113709
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://parlinfoweb.aph.gov.au/piweb/TranslateWIPILink.aspx?Folder=BIOGS&Criteria=NAME_ID:7E4%3B

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:23, 20 December 2017 (UTC)