This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I appreciate that Wikipedia already has an article on the Mirabell Palace (which could do with expansion based on the German article), a palace that was built directly on the site of the Altenau palace. It would be possible to cover the two in one article; but I think this unhelpful as (1) almost nothing remains of the old Altenau palace, only a few remnants in the cellars of the Mirabell palace, and (2) the Altenau palace was a historically important building in its time, belonging to a major notable figure, and (3) it is possible to write about it in a sourced manner that doesn't overlap with its successor. In fact, the German Wikipedia treats the two palaces as separate, in separate articles, so I am following that model. I hope this will be okay! Elemimele (talk) 20:37, 22 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I think the sourcing isn't ideal. The original German article uses general sources as well as inline citations, which means it's hard to work out which statements are supported by what. My feeling is that the sourcing is sufficient to justify writing an article, and to assure accuracy, but is far from perfect. I have therefore gone ahead and translated, but also added tags to request improved consistency in citations, and preferably more sourcing. I cannot sort out the consistency myself as I do not have the written, physical sources available. Sorry! Elemimele (talk) 21:53, 22 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
I agree. I have just accepted this article - clearly notable and the logic of making it a separate article is convincing. But it is not particularly well sourced yet. This is often a problem with translated articles. It would be good to get hold of the works cited and check them for exact page references. But well done on the translation project. Doric Loon (talk) 12:43, 29 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
