Talk:Alessandra Biaggi
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Redirect?
edit@Muboshgu: Why is this page a redirect, and why is her article in draft stage? Can I assist in any way? Emjackson42 (talk) 01:21, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
- Because what's in the draft doesn't meet WP:GNG. Are there enough new sources of her that meet that line? I can look for them, too. There's a lot of people who are going to need pages from the 2018 election, but she's only won the primary, not the general. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:19, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Muboshgu: Thanks for the information. She has had a number of additional interviews and write-ups since the primary win that could provide information for this article. I can plug away a bit at the draft if you don't mind my doing so. Emjackson42 (talk) 09:21, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Mistake
editThis rollback seems to have been a mistake, as discussed here a day ago. https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/User_talk:2603:7000:2143:8500:7922:9180:9213:BBCA --2603:7000:2143:8500:4937:718F:51C8:2907 (talk) 03:03, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Chief of staff
editI'm new to editing Wikipedia, and tried to add more info to my edit.
Before Seward could finish lodging his complaint over the extension of a $2.50 fee on retail tire sales, a loud crash and a commotion startled him from behind. Someone yelled, “We need to pause!” The state senate live stream of the budget debate cut to an exterior shot of the senate chambers with elevator music playing in lieu of live audio.
An intern had collapsed, Sen. Michael Gianaris explained a few minutes later as the session resumed. Alessandra Biaggi’s chief of staff Andrew Mutnick rushed to the aid of the intern who “seems to be OK,” Gianaris reported.
“Fortunately, he was fine and had suffered from an episode of vasovagal syncope,” Andrew Mutnick later wrote in an email describing the incident in a way only a doctor would. A pediatrician by trade, Mutnick was an early booster of Biaggi during the 2018 Democratic primary campaign against then state Sen. Jeffrey Klein, and became her chief of staff when she took office in January.
On May 10, Mutnick left her office after just four months, citing the March 13 incident on the state senate floor as a catalyst for his departure. “Shortly following that, I realized that I was missing medicine and would prefer to return pediatric practice.” [1]
The original source for the section on her firing men and hiring only women is a highly partisan blog, and I've been looking for anything to corroborate it. I read some of their other content and much of it is disingenuous at best and outright lies at worst — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.132.51.199 (talk) 22:32, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Father, Grandfather Conviction
editIf it is worth mentioning that her grandfather was a Congressman, why is it not worth mentioning that her grandfather and father were both convicted of corruption (forcing her grandfather out of Congress)? See Grace Meng to see how a similar issue was handled on a similar page. It seems like we are leaving encyclopedic, notable information out of the page by mentioning that Mario Biaggi was a Congressman (twice in the article) without mentioning how his career ended- his conviction is easily more notable than any other aspect of his life, including his election to the House. Iloveapphysics (talk) 01:41, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- See WP:BLPBALANCE which states "Beware of claims that rely on guilt by association". Just because another article has a similar violation does not excuse it here. It may have been one of the last major things Mario Biaggi was notable for, but with a 20 year career in congress, it is far from the only thing, and yet it is the only that is highlighted in Alessandra Biaggi's article. No positive aspects of his career are mentioned. Discussion of the conviction is only about 15% of Mario Biaggi's article and there is whole section of accolades, including many that he received after his conviction. Yet none of that is mentioned in Alessandra Biaggi's article. Moreover, the wording in Alessandra Biaggi's article leaves out important context, thereby making it appear all the more negative in Alessandra Biaggi's article. Anyone who would want to find this information can click on the link in her article, and see both the positives and the negatives, as well as the full context of Mario Biaggi's convictions and acquittals. That is what internal links are for. Tdl1060 (talk) 04:58, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
I Seriously Doubt Biaggi Was A Spoile For Mike Lawler
editIn contrast to defund the police advocate Biaggi, Lawler made the issue of crime one of his main campaign platforms. Along with inflation, crime was even a centerpiece issue discussed in even an interview with Republican-leaning media outlet Fox News.[1] Speakfor (talk) 01:55, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
This is a self-written self promoting article
editWhat is the tag to report that? 24.72.157.80 (talk) 20:51, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- You are alleging this based on what? – Muboshgu (talk) 21:03, 30 June 2023 (UTC)