Talk:Alec Empire/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process.

Checking against GA criteria

To uphold the quality of Wikipedia:Good articles, all articles listed as Good articles are being reviewed against the GA criteria as part of the GA project quality task force. While all the hard work that has gone into this article is appreciated, unfortunately, as of November 23, 2009, this article fails to satisfy the criteria, as detailed below. For that reason, the article has been delisted from WP:GA. However, if improvements are made bringing the article up to standards, the article may be nominated at WP:GAN. If you feel this decision has been made in error, you may seek remediation at WP:GAR.

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   The 'Lead needs to be expanded to summarise the whole article as per WP:LEAD

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Ref #9 and #24 are dead links, which have been tagged. I have added citation needed tags where I believe they are necessary. Fansite material needs to be attributed as such in the text as it is not really WP:RS and it must conform with the guidleines for sourcving at WP:BLP. Please check whether all the ELs actually are encyclopaedic matrial asd per the guidelines at WP:External links. I think many could be removed.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   On hold for seven days for above issues to be fixed. I will notify major contrinbutors and projects. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:00, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

   As no one has responded in seven days, despite notices to all major contributora and project pages, I am de-listing this article. please read the information at the top of this page about renominating. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:57, 23 November 2009 (UTC)