Talk:Alcohol Justice
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Criticism section
editThis article should have a section which discusses the criticism which people have against the organization. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.101.79.218 (talk) 21:15, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- From what I can tell, based on the comments in the sections above, there has been a very persist effort lasting many many years to introduce criticism from one individual or group with a very strong POV into this article. This effort extends beyond this one article and has been characterized as spamming (see the "Edits July 2008" section above and the page linked from there). For this reason, I think there needs to be, a the very least, 1) indication that the criticism is notable, 2) indication that the criticism is neutral, and 3) independent established Wikipedia editors that agree it is appropriate to add that criticism to this article. Deli nk (talk) 14:07, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Totally disagree; criticism, by nature, is biased. Unprotect the article right now!— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1002:b11e:8a92:49b1:30d0:e896:e6d9 (talk • contribs) 08:10, August 24, 2017 (UTC)
- You just don't seem to understand. EVERYTHING is criticized by someone. The overwhelming majority of criticism is simply not noteworthy. "Jane Smith of Sheboygan, WI says that butterflies can cause epileptic seizures in some individuals" does not belong in butterfly, unless independent reliable sources discuss her criticisms. Independent reliable sources have not discussed your criticisms. They simply do not belong on Wikipedia. - SummerPhDv2.0 17:04, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Alcohol Justice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061208234637/http://www.cspinet.org/booze/CAFST/index.htm to http://cspinet.org/booze/CAFST/index.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:35, 30 June 2017 (UTC)