Talk:Albert Reynolds

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Extensive Editing needed

edit

This article has zero citations for sources of the facts quoted. It is in urgent need of a rewrite.

Tayana 23:56, 4 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Libel case

edit

He was a claimant in a landmark libel case in the English courts - so much so that there is now a "Reynolds defence" in libel cases - this needs to be addressed.--Macca7174 15:46, 10 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Mahon Tribunal references

edit

Added details of his activities emerging in tribunal. Copy edited to remove original research in contravention of NPOV and NOR —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.46.187.176 (talk) 20:15, 17 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Irish form of his name

edit

Several sources which we should regard as "reliable" use the Irish form of his name. Not just http://gd.wiki.x.io/wiki/Albert_Reynolds and http://ga.wiki.x.io/wiki/Ailbhe_Mac_Raghnaill but also Irish government documents and biographies (e.g. http://www.archontology.org/nations/eire/eire_govt/reynolds.php)

--ClickRick (talk) 22:54, 29 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

None of those are reliable sources, the first 2 are wikis, and government departments translate the names of ministers in to Irish regardless, where they use this or not. Reynolds is not KNOWN by his Irish name, it's just a translation. See WP:IMOS#Correct_Irish_orthography_in_naming_people for correct usage in en.wikipedia. Also, I have never heard called Ailbhe Mac Raghnaill used in any English language media when referring to Reynolds now or during his time in public office, unlike Éamon Ó Cuív who is always known by his Irish name in Irish and English. Snappy (talk) 03:29, 30 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
1. Indeed the first two are wikis but
1. They are wikipedia family so we should AGF
2. I said "not only" those sources
2. The fact that the Irish government used the name means that we are not inventing the name here - we are merely including the fact of it being used. This argument alone is sufficient for the Irish form of his name to warrant inclusion here.
3. You made no mention of the biographical source which I cited.
4. You are right to cite that part of MOS. Paragraph 2 refers. Look at the example given there - it's almost identical to this one.
--ClickRick (talk) 06:35, 30 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
The fact that the Irish government used the name means that we are not inventing the name here - we are merely including the fact of it being used. - So you are suggesting we use other peoples inventions then? The fact remains, Albert Reynolds was/is NEVER referred to in the English language media in Ireland other than by his name in English. I have never heard of archontology.org so I don't know if it reliable or not. I'm not disputing that the Irish translation of his name is Ailbhe Mac Raghnaill, I am disputing whether he ever used this name or was known by it. Indeed, there is no evidence that Reynolds even speaks the Irish language. You are engaging in WP:OR or copying other peoples OR. Snappy (talk) 07:44, 30 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
You are suggesting that WP should deny the Irish form of the name, despite it having been used by the Irish government in official documentation. I see a failure to meet WP:NPOV if we allow that. --ClickRick (talk) 09:06, 30 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Whereas you are suggesting we add in fiction made up by civil servants who indulged in their own OR. WP is not here to replicate other peoples mistakes. There is no evidence that Albert Reynolds was known by this name, no evidence that he used it and no evidence that he even speaks the language. Can you provide any reference from the Irish Times, the Irish Independent, the Irish Examiner, RTÉ or any other English language media outlet referring to Albert Reynolds by the Irish language translation? Snappy (talk) 09:40, 30 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Two terms

edit

Reynolds served two (short) terms, not one. He headed a FF-PD government in succession to Haughey in 1992, and then after a general election served two years from January 1993 to 1994 in a FF-Labour coalition. 109.79.105.185 (talk) 22:56, 21 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Place of birth

edit

Apparently there are two places called "Kilglass": Kilglass in County Sligo for which we have an article and Kilglass (Roscommon) in County Roscommon for which we do not. I've looked on the map and the second one fits the bill better (not to mention I've been told by someone with local knowledge that we're wrong ;-), so I've linked to it to help someone get an article up and running for it. HTH HAND —Phil | Talk 13:42, 30 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Albert Reynolds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:19, 29 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

WP:IMOS

edit

Where in WP:IMOS justifies your edits? Snappy (talk) 17:42, 9 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

It doesnt, Ni being mentioned in the article, and NI being used in the same CONTEXT in the article are two completely different things. As WP:IRE-IRL makes case on, at this rate the whole article title would need re-addressing, and who wants that hassle. Murry1975 (talk) 10:06, 10 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Albert Reynolds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:08, 4 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Albert Reynolds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:13, 30 June 2017 (UTC)Reply