Talk:Alamo Bowl

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Rankings and Home/Visitor

edit

I went through the Alamo Bowl website and archived information on the Internet to add rankings and home/visitor designations to the Previous Results chart. I also removed the intro paragraph about the 1947 game, since it's already wiki-linked at the top of the article. Last, I added the paragraph about the Alamo Bowl's only overtime game. Clipper471 00:10, 4 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Great work! I especiallly like the table featuring the team ranking and also the attendance. Best, Johntex\talk 09:37, 15 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

How is MasterCard no longer title sponsor?

edit

How? There has been no alert I've seen that MasterCard has pulled the plugSoxrock 17:14, 30 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

My guess is that they decided to not renew the deal for another year. And why should MasterCard notify everyone that they didn't? It could create bad publicity. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 06:08, 31 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

No reason to split

edit

There is absolutely no reason why Alamo Bowl broadcasters should be split from Alamo Bowl. That list is a stub that is only 4kb long. The main article is 13kb long, much of which is tables and lists, well within the limits of WP:SIZE. A single article is only 17kb long, which is permitted, so there is no reason why the article should be split. Reywas92Talk 17:50, 31 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Alamo Bowl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:38, 17 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Two 2016 Alamo Bowls

edit

I'm trying to update/fix the infobox, which previously didn't include the results of the latest game. The linking is off, the problem being the fact that there are (or will be) two "2016 Alamo Bowl"s: the one that took place on January 2, 2016 and the one that takes place on December 29, 2016. Any ideas on how to clarify/fix this? Should the current Wiki article titled 2016 Alamo Bowl be renamed "January 2016 Alamo Bowl"? Any suggestions/help would be great. Thanks.Pistongrinder (talk) 21:07, 4 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your help (on this page and the other one)!Pistongrinder (talk) 18:41, 29 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alamo Bowl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:19, 29 June 2017 (UTC)Reply