Talk:Akbar's tomb

India: Delhi / Uttar Pradesh / History Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Delhi (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Uttar Pradesh (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as High-importance).

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Death Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article Start

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The information here is distilled from standard guidebooks (Rough Guide, DK, Nelles etc), and agrees with the information in the many websites giving descriptions. If any editor has a reliable academic work to validate and expand the article, it would be good. Also, the graphics are a bit out of date since restoration is continuous, and more recent and better-quality public domain graphics are sought. . . .LinguisticDemographer 16:17, 18 September 2007 (UTC).Reply

From my memory as a very young child living in Agra in 1934-5, one of the minarets had been destroyed by lightning, and if this is true it has since been rebuilt. There may therefore be pictures of the monument in its damaged state or during the repair works, perhaps in newspaper archives, which might be helpful. Apologies if this memory is false!Seadowns (talk) 13:17, 10 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Akbar's tomb. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100619173350/http://archnet.org/library/sites/one-site.jsp?site_id=2257 to http://www.archnet.org/library/sites/one-site.jsp?site_id=2257

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:27, 29 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic