Talk:Airlink

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Dodger67 in topic Accidents and Incidents

Notability of the incident on 18 November 2009.

edit

Is this incident really sufficiently notable? Incidents such as this are everyday occurences, if WP had to list them all we'd have no time to do anything else. There wasn't even any damage. Its trivial. Roger (talk) 18:34, 19 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

I edited it in to replace a copypaste of the Airlink press release. I have absolutely no objection to removing it if you think it's not notable. - htonl (talk) 18:56, 19 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

As htonl pointed out, yes, it's in Joburg proper:

WhisperToMe (talk) 23:13, 14 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Page protection

edit

I have requested full page protection for the page, to prevent two editors involved in an edit warring over contents to be blocked. Please discuss your differences here. Edit warring is strongly discouraged in Wikipedia.--Jetstreamer (talk) 16:36, 21 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

The matter appears to be settled, so protection is probably not needed at this time. Roger (talk) 17:19, 21 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Ok, I will withdraw my request.--Jetstreamer (talk) 17:31, 21 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Airlink. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:31, 6 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Airlink. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:31, 28 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

  Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.flyairlink.com/profile/airlink-timeline. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Aoi (青い) (talk) 02:08, 19 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Accidents and Incidents

edit

User:Dodger67 removed the engine failure incident because it did not meet the criteria in WP:AIRCRASH for inclusion in an article about an Airline. User:RaydenAG reverted the removal using WP:WHATABOUTX or WP:OTHERCONTENT as his/her/their justification. Objectively the incident does not meet WP:AIRCRASH and WP:WHATABOUTX are not sufficient grounds to revert the deletion. I believe the incident relating to the engine failure should be removed from the article. Wayne Jayes (talk) 06:17, 14 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Removed again, still per AIRCRASH - nobody died, no aircraft destroyed, no lawsuit, no regulatory consequences. An unremarkable inflight engine failure that resulted in a perfectly normal single-engine landing. Incidents of this type happen practically every day. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:38, 17 July 2022 (UTC)Reply