Talk:Airbus A321

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Airbus A321. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160915235037/https://www.easa.europa.eu/system/files/dfu/TCDS_EASA%20A%20064_%20Airbus_%20A318_A319_A320_A321_Iss_22.pdf to https://www.easa.europa.eu/system/files/dfu/TCDS_EASA%20A%20064_%20Airbus_%20A318_A319_A320_A321_Iss_22.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:18, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

A320neo Section Out-Dated?

Hi,

the section on the A320neo seems to be outdated. It is still referring to it being in development. It is already in production as the A320neo article states.

Bjoern

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• A321 final assembly (9351765668).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:37, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

main pic change

• 
  Current, condor with winglets
• 
  Proposed, American with wing fences
• 
  alternate clean config

While the current picture is quite nice, its operator is also quite rare and may distract from the subject, so I went through commons to find a similar one from largest operator American. I picked one with the small initial wing fences instead of the later winglets upgrade to avoid confusion with the neo. Alternatively, I found another one in clean config, may be a little unusual.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 14:10, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

no bibliography

References like "Norris & Wagner 1999, p. 50" and "Eden 2008, p. 25" appear but there are no titles listed. Tom239 (talk) 02:03, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Indeed, maybe due to poor copy-pasting when the A321 (like the A319 or A318) was split from the main A320 article. This ref system may not be as robust as inline citations. Anyway, I would propose to merge those variants splits back in the main A320 article, all it have done is to make the maintenance more difficult.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 07:53, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

A321NX

One of these flew over today, I checked Wikipedia and there is no comment on it :(. Perhaps someone might add something. https://www.airliners.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1388129 Chris.Bristol (talk) 12:25, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

It is an A321Neo with a "Cabin Flex" interior. Cabin Flex is described on the Neo Page. MilborneOne (talk) 16:21, 28 October 2021 (UTC)