Talk:AirCars/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: KGRAMR (talk · contribs) 17:10, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 12:14, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

I will be reviewing this, comments will probably be finished in the next 72 hours! Arconning (talk) 12:14, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

@KGRAMR Here are my comments. Hope they can be addressed. Arconning (talk) 15:51, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Prose and MoS

• Dates are inconsistent. Ex: Infobox has M/D/Y, ref 27 has Y/M/D. Fix every dating system in the page so that they will be consistent all through out.

 Done -- Roberth Martinez (talk) 23:16, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Lead and infobox

• The player is tasked with destroying key targets,, remove comma.

 Done -- Roberth Martinez (talk) 21:57, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

• co-operative campaign, add a comma at the end.

 Done -- Roberth Martinez (talk) 21:57, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

• critics;, replace semicolon with period.

 Done -- Roberth Martinez (talk) 21:57, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

• before playing was considered a disadvantage, add a comma at the end.

 Done -- Roberth Martinez (talk) 21:57, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Gameplay and premise

• The player is tasked with eliminating the organization by piloting a prototype aircar, which is teleported to a E.B.N.E.R.S. base complex.[3][5][6][7][8], this seems like WP:OVERCITE, kinda. If they all say the same statement, probably remove at least one, or put some of the references between the sentences.

 Done -- Roberth Martinez (talk) 22:33, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

• a E.B.N.E.R.S., an E.B.N.E.R.S.

 Done -- Roberth Martinez (talk) 22:33, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

• shotgun, machine gun, a shotgun, a machine gun.

 Done -- Roberth Martinez (talk) 22:33, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

• mines and a smoke screen., add a comma after mines.

 Done -- Roberth Martinez (talk) 22:33, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

• have effect, have an effect.

 Done -- Roberth Martinez (talk) 22:33, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

• display of the aircar shows , just remove the last s.

 Done -- Roberth Martinez (talk) 22:33, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

• campaign using JagLink , add a comma at the end.

 Done -- Roberth Martinez (talk) 22:33, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Development and release

• Some of the statements have like 5 references at the end, if they all support the statement with the same information probably omit one.

 Done -- Roberth Martinez (talk) 22:33, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

• Electronics Show,, remove comma.

 Done -- Roberth Martinez (talk) 22:33, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

• but received a poor response, add a comma at the end.

 Done -- Roberth Martinez (talk) 22:33, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

• without box, without a box.

 Done -- Roberth Martinez (talk) 22:33, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Reception

• No issues.

Legacy

• No issues.

Images

• Images have fair use licenses which makes sense for the article at hand. Pass.

Refs

• Earwig, violation unlikely.
• Random ref check: 1, 13, 17, 20, 25, 27, 45, 51, okay. 34 seems a bit dodgy, could you explain if this is a reliable source? Seems like an ebay listing due to the part of the website's domain name.

Allright, i'll explain what Jaguar Sector II (ref #34) is: Jaguar Sector II was a website similar to Planet Virtual Boy (a website dedicated to the Virtual Boy) but dedicated to the Atari Jaguar instead where they had their own databases for games and their release dates, plus dates of their own self-funded releases. Roberth Martinez (talk) 22:35, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Misc

• No ongoing edit war, pretty broad and focused information on the topic, neutral once again.

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

@Arconning:OK, i managed to get around every inquiry you had. Are there any more issues left to be addressed? Roberth Martinez (talk) 23:03, 4 July 2024 (UTC)