This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aiden article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
WHAT???
editFor God's sake, SOMEONE get 'Pop-Punk' off of the labels. How do Aiden compare in any way with blink-182, Green Day, MXPX, or Good Charlotte? Honestly. Emo? I could understand. Post-Hardcore? Sure. Hardcore, Post-Punk, Art Punk, they all fit in some way or other, but NOT Pop-Punk!
pop-punk
editcan someone explain to me why this band was genrefied as "pop-punk"?
Yeah, how did pop-punk come up? That's just weird... -Shinobi101
they're definetely not pop punk i'd put them in more of the emorock or gothrock category they are not at all pop and not at all punk
i'd say they're emo. they have all of the characteristics of it...
you going to explain more?
Hair Loss & Tooth Decay?
editcome on now.
Fox criticism
editMightn't it be more accurate that the video criticised shows inter-religion violence - white Christian groups burning black Christian group's churches and condemns that? Fox misrepresented this one quite badly.