Talk:Agile usability engineering

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Just checked history of page - it was written by some students which explains why the unusual reference to IBM RUP which was not correct - I think they were just a bit confused - Page still needs more cleaning... RiczWest (talk) 22:46, 10 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Just minor edited this page - deleted many repetitive links on this page. Checked the linked pages of the links and those pages also have many repetitive links, was wondering if someone can put the linked pages on community portal 'Fix wikilinks' - linked pages need more cleaning (regarding links)... Tvmxcy (talk) 06:48, 24 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Agile usability engineering. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:44, 5 October 2016 (UTC)Reply