Talk:Agent-general

Contradiction

"By the 1990s, many Australian state governments regarded the office of their Agent General in London as a costly anachronism, even for promoting tourism and investment, and have since been closed and subsumed into the Australian High Commission. Only Queensland now has a separate government office in London.

The majority of Australian States continue to have Agents General in London as of 2006."

These two paragraphs contradict each other. Can someone confirm which is correct? -- Necrothesp 16:39, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Both are correct. The seperate offices were closed, and the Agents-General moved into the 'Australia Centre' within the High Commission. The post of Agent-General for each state still exists, and is still filled, and they also continue to have support staff working on trade and tourism. They just don't maintain distinct central London premises. 136.8.152.13 14:49, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

That needs to be made clear then. -- Necrothesp 17:03, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Pluralisation and hyphenation

Titles of the form [officer]-general are usually pluralised as [officers]-general, but this article use(d) Agent Generals as its plural throughout (and note the lack of hyphen). I did a bit of research, and found several governmental and academic documents from Queensland and New South Wales that use "agents-general", and one each from South Australia and South Africa using "agent-generals". (Note the hyphen in all cases.) As such, I've gone through and added hyphens, and changed all plurals to "agents-general". (I haven't added a note about the pluralisation differences, figuring it would be a bit too dictionary-ish.) And I've moved the page from Agent General to Agent-General, which formerly existed only as a redirect. (One could have made a case for Agent-general, but I based the change on usage at Governor-General.) It's a pretty big set of changes, so: any concerns? -- Perey (talk) 04:39, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Agent-General. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/parlment/hansart.nsf/V3Key/LA19921027007

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:16, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Agent-general. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050208073345/http://www.mri.gouv.qc.ca/london/en/ to http://www.mri.gouv.qc.ca/london/en/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071026085036/http://invest.vic.gov.au/About+Us/International+Network/London.htm to http://invest.vic.gov.au/About+Us/International+Network/London.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:04, 8 January 2018 (UTC)