Talk:Affinity Labs

Untitled

This article is not promotional in any way. Its is a factual account of the existence of a company that has lots of users spread over all its sites. Each statement in the article is backed up with a reputable source that is not affiliated in any way with the company, and there is no statement of opinion anywhere in it.Teckdiva (talk) 19:20, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

You might want to elaborate a bit on why it is a notable organisation. Such short articles normally do not warrant the creation of encyclopedic pages. Yes, you have mentioned some references, but aren't company mergers/acqusitions commonplace these days? Give reference to news articles other than merger/acqusitions/company earnings and it would justify retaining this article. Thanks Shootthedevgru (talk) 01:04, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

I've added some sources that have nothing to do with the merger of Affinity and Monster. The main reason that Affinity is worth of note is the size of its user base. Many of the sites, such as policelink, have quite a substantial number users (at least 5 digits).Teckdiva (talk) 19:20, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Affinity Labs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://hmforcescouk.blogspot.co.uk/2011/08/hmforcescouk-what-does-it-offer-you.html/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070421210847/http://www.mayfield.com:80/newsarticles/2006-12-04_mayfield_announces.htm to http://www.mayfield.com/newsarticles/2006-12-04_mayfield_announces.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:51, 5 October 2016 (UTC)