Talk:Afşin-Elbistan power stations/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Chidgk1 (talk · contribs) 08:04, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: BigChrisKenney (talk · contribs) 05:21, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello, @Chidgk1: I will be reviewing this article for the January 2025 backlog elimination drive. BigChrisKenney (talk) 05:21, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Intro

I made some edits you may wish to review.

Afşin-Elbistan A

Proposed expansion

I made some edits you may wish to review.

History

"In 2004 or 2005, an EIA was done re rehabilitation and FGD."

• I'm not sure what this sentence is talking about. Could you clarify it please?

I made some edits you may wish to review.

Technology

I made some edits you may wish to review.

Afşin-Elbistan B

History

I made some edits you may wish to review.

Opposition

I made an edit you may wish to review.

Cancelled power stations

Afşin-Elbistan C

I deleted duplicate information in the second paragraph that was mentioned in the first paragraph.

In the third paragraph, citation 54 needs to be updated.

I made some edits you may wish to review.

Afşin-Elbistan D and E

I made an edit you may wish to review.

Coal

I made some edits you may wish to review.

Mine

Good!

Disease and deaths

I made some edits you may wish to review.

Economics

I made some edits you may wish to review.

Pollution

Added a comma.

Greenhouse gas emissions

I made some edits you may wish to review.

Opposition

I made some edits you may wish to review.

Public opinion

Good!

Sources

I checked roughly every 5th one.

80 - I could not open the link, also, it is missing information such as when it was retrieved.

6 (privacy concerns)

102 (redirect)

Several links are 404.

13, 14, 23, 46, 64, 93

Images

All are in the public domain or under creative commons.

I had to do a lot of editing in this article, but the content is solid. Please review my comments, in particular; Afşin-Elbistan A → History, Cancelled power stations → Afşin-Elbistan C, and source 80. Once you have reviewed my comments and made some changes, I will come back for a final assesment. BigChrisKenney (talk) 06:53, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

@BigChrisKenney Great I like that you have done the edits rather than writing a lot of tiny things here like some reviewers do. Many of them I agree are improvements but there are a few I don’t think are quite right so I will try and explain in edit comments why. However feel free to press your points if my edit comments are wrong or unclear - I won’t be at all offended. Chidgk1 (talk) 16:25, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Note to self: need to read gem article to try and understand EIA conclusion myself (e.g. are they talking about a change in the emission limit? any public info re derogation? when was FGD actually installed?) then CLARIFY 2004 EIA Chidgk1 (talk) 17:44, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Have reported problem with cite 6 to website owner Chidgk1 (talk) 18:37, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Duh I should have run the cite archiving much earlier - note to self CAN I RUN SOMETHING TO FIND ALL DEAD LINKS THEN FIX THEN RUN CITE ARCHIVING