Talk:Advice and consent

New Supreme Court Nomination

Might want to lock this down for a little while. The definition of 'Advice and consent" might become a big debate while we have to deal with nomination a new supreme court justice

108.31.72.245 (talk) 00:01, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Advice and Consent Outside the U.S.

Should there be some mention of non-U.S. uses of the phrase "advise and consent"? On http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Enacting_formula, I see that the phrase has been used as part of the enacting formula for legislation in the U.K. and other countries that nominally follow the U.K.' queen. I also notice that http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Judicial_and_Bar_Council mentions a defunct Phillipine process that sounds like "advice and consent" (and is characterized as such in one of the "Did you know?" questions on today's Wikipedia front page). I'm guessing that some constitutions that follow the U.S. model--and perhaps some others proceeding from different angles--also have advice and consent in nomination processes, but I'm not sure.Hickoryhillster 14:11, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

For countries where the exact phrase is used, add them under another level two header. Governments that have a similar process, but with a different wording, can be listed under the See also section. Koweja 17:19, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

List of Senate-confirmable positions?

Do we have a current list of Senate-confirmable positions in the U.S.? If yes, it should be linked from this article and if not, it'd be good to create one.... Nsk92 (talk) 12:43, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Waiver of Advice and Consent?

Just a thought. If the Senate refuses to advise and consent (as opposed to denying consent) could that be construed as a waiver of their rights and the nomination is not blocked? The question is if they have an affirmative duty to confirm rather than a right to deny. Is "not voting" mean a required "yes" is denied, or and optional "no" is not asserted? Marcperkel (talk) 02:00, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Advice and consent. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081023075214/http://www.votesmart.org/reference/fedlist/fed76.htm to http://www.votesmart.org/reference/fedlist/fed76.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:56, 4 October 2016 (UTC)