Talk:Adrian Johns

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Adrian Johns/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 06:22, 12 October 2013 (UTC) I'll do this one. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 06:22, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	lead is inadequate, does not properly summarise life and career
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	several medals are uncited
	2c. it contains no original research.	miscategorisation removed
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	on hold for seven days for below comments to be addressednot listed, on the basis of the inadequate lead (1b) and uncited medals (2b)

Comments

• lead should summarise major life events, not just his current role and immediate past one.
• several awards are unreferenced
• Guggenheim Fellow is categorised but not referenced Done

• Checked the Guffenheim source, it was a different Adrian Johns. Removed. buffbills7701 20:14, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

• no initial caps for ranks unless used in conjunction with his name Done(by Pm67)
• I believe the appropriate honorific prefix includes his naval rank Done

• Fixed. buffbills7701 20:14, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Review completed, on hold for seven days for above comments to be addressed. Regards, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 06:42, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

• This nomination will fail unless the above issues are addressed in the next 18 hours or so. Regards, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 13:50, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

• Sorry about that. Never received a notice that it was on hold. buffbills7701 20:14, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

• Did one myself, just the lead and unreferenced awards to address. Regards, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 00:10, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

• @Buffbills7701:, I'm going to close this tomorrow my time as not listed on the basis of the inadequate lead (1b) and uncited medals (2b). Regards, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 12:21, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Adrian Johns. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131113162256/http://www.chronicle.gi/headlines_details.php?id=17514 to http://www.chronicle.gi/headlines_details.php?id=17514
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/newsroom/latest-news/?view=PressR&id=19162254
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927140743/http://www.chronicle.gi/headlines_details.php?id=16362 to http://www.chronicle.gi/headlines_details.php?id=16362
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927140743/http://www.chronicle.gi/headlines_details.php?id=16362 to http://www.chronicle.gi/headlines_details.php?id=16362

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:29, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adrian Johns. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070506083225/http://www.royal-navy.mod.uk/server/show/conWebDoc.1756 to http://www.royal-navy.mod.uk/server/show/conWebDoc.1756

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:08, 2 January 2017 (UTC)