This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Adobe Voco article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is there a Wikipedia page for 2D RGB forgery/counterfeiting?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohmajJTcpNk
2600:8801:982:290B:8446:DF73:C478:D2E7 (talk) 16:50, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
- I couldn't see anything in Category:Media manipulation, as Photo manipulation exists, maybe Video manipulation? Cool video btw – Paul · ✉ 01:33, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- I tried to gather the concerns together & to remove some non-neutral wording. I put in a red link to Video manipulation for now by the link to this, if you find or think of a better article please feel free to change it – Paul · ✉ 02:20, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Adobe VoCo has nothing to do with image or video editing/counterfeiting. There may be a danger of *AUDIO* counterfeiting, but I see the main purpose of these kinds of audio programs for voices to increase the range of possibilities within the entertainment industry, where artificially re-created voices need only be at a lower level of authenticity that makes them easily detectable if not by the human ear then by forensic means. --2003:EF:13C6:FE20:39B0:9DA1:4D14:38BC (talk) 14:21, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Ok
You.are.sowonk (talk) 06:17, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
What is my name Azhar Munawar (talk) 13:56, 24 December 2022 (UTC)