Talk:Administrative divisions of Bryansk Oblast

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Uninhabited rural settlements

edit

Question--Why are there 98 uninhabited rural settlements in Bryansk? Does or could it have to do with administrative relocation after 1986's Chernobyl accident? Honest question. Seems odd.--ChrisTheRed 19:24, 18 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Chris! The phenomenon of uninhabited rural settlements is not unique to Bryansk Oblast alone. You might want to check out the discussion of a related question here and here. If that's not enough, feel free to let me know. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 20:03, 20 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Administrative divisions of Bryansk Oblast. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:32, 4 October 2016 (UTC)Reply