Talk:Actian NoSQL Object Database

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Klbrain in topic Merge

Promotional

edit

An excellent cut and paste from some kind of marketing document. The attempt to achieve a neutral point of view may be hampered in cases by using "we" when describing actions and opinions that must surely attribute to Versant itself or its agents and employees.

The is no mention of the cost of Versant or it's licensing models - surely these represent valuable information in this Wiki page. As much as feature sets and performance issues.

Zschub (talk) 03:49, 6 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Pure marketing. Although the subject is noteworthy otherwise in Wikipedia. Maybe it should be deleted and rewritten from a neutral point of view, evidenced with proper references.

It is too promotional in tone, and this problem existed for far too long. Options are either to edit it down (my preference), delete, or merge to Versant Corporation. Note with the company's apparent demise, should be written into past tense and noted to be historical. W Nowicki (talk) 00:41, 7 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Versant Object Database. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:19, 31 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Merge

edit

A merge of the database and corporate page was proposed in 2016, but no discussion started. The direction isn't obvious, as the company has more than one product, but it seems reasonable that the company could be merged to the product it's most known for. So, I weakly support the merge; either direction should be fine. Klbrain (talk) 06:49, 7 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

    Y Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 22:17, 17 June 2018 (UTC)Reply