Talk:Acerinox accident

Spain Low‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment Low‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Occupational Safety and Health Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Acerinox accident. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070321092450/http://www.nuclearpolicy.info/publications/scrapmetal.php to http://www.nuclearpolicy.info/publications/scrapmetal.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:42, 25 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

FUD + nonsense + where is the source?

A quote from the article: The radioactive levels measured were up to 1000 times higher than normal.

First problem: What the heck does ' radioactive levels ' mean? The effective dose-rate of absorbed background radiation? Measured in Sievert/second (or more often in nSv/h)? Or the (simple) dose-rate of the absorbed radiation, measured in Gy/s (or using the base SI units: J/(kg*s)? Or maybe it meant activity concentration of the Cs-137?

2nd problem: Where is the source?

Now it took us only a couple second to find this publication from the IAEA: https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Pub1042_web.pdf which tells as, that the level of Cs-137 (activity-concentration) in the air was increased from the usual 2 μBq/m^3 to 2000 μ/Bq/m^3 (not everywhere, only in some places). Just to see how scary this elevation was, let's compare: The activity concentration of the natural radon-isotopes (daughter element of U-235, U-238, Th-232) are about 10 Bq/m^3 to 60 Bq/m^3 or (10000000 μBq/m^3 to 60000000 μBq/m^3) in the (outdoor)air. Even the atmospheric C-14 is about 40 mBq/s (or 40000 μBq/s).

Well, english is not my favorite language, sorry for grammar/typo... (I forgot to add the other source from the natural occuring isotopes: Radiochimica Acta 70/71, 3 4 5 - 3 5 3 (1995) Title: Radioactivity in the Atmosphere Author: Gäggeler

Add topic