Talk:Acacia koa

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Discussion

edit

I added a short paragraph about koaia in here. However, it might be better to make this a separate page. KarlM 02:07, 25 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Move proposal

edit

This wood is commonly called simply koa in English. I propose moving it to Koa. KOA can be moved to KOA (disambiguation) to avoid any confusion. Badagnani 00:42, 22 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

No. It is established naming convention for plants to use the scientific name. Hesperian 05:15, 22 August 2007 (UTC)Reply


Uses

Some of this section is very badly written and poorly punctuated. guest 16:57, 3 Feb 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.43.141.187 (talk)

contradictory information

edit

the main article states or implies that koa is abundant in Hawai'i, and then you get to the conservation section and learn that actually, it's basically been killed off. Which is it? you can't have it both ways. having read this article, I'm inclined to think there's some citations needed, editorializing, that sort of thing going on in the main article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:1C1:C201:8D00:D59D:33D8:B4FF:D476 (talk) 02:29, 16 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Acacia koa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:29, 3 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Conservation status?

edit

It would be nice to mention the plant's specific conservation status, especially given that there's already an appropriate discussion of threats to both its existing population and its recovery. Antediluvian67 (talk) 13:43, 8 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Acacia koa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:48, 12 December 2017 (UTC)Reply