This seems ripe for abuse. If their service supports 25 cryptocurrencies, what's the rationale for listing 7 of them? It should either be the full list, or none at all, instead of letting people choose their favorite cryptocurrency to add to the list. In any case, I suggest removing this partial list from the article lead, and if relevant, the full list can be added in the article body. Thoughts? --Btcgeek (talk) 03:08, 19 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
Haven't looked at sources in detail, however a majority are either primary sources or from unreliable crypto outlets like CoinDesk, Cointelegraph, and Bitcoin.com. Without those, seems like notability would be harder to establish without further discussion. At the very least, significant portions of the article should be trimmed with unsourced and unverifiable claims removed. In addition, the intro and some other statements read as promoting Abra's products/services and should be reworded, statements with undue weight evaluated. HiddenLemon // talk 20:46, 2 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
