Talk:Aboriginal title

Aboriginal title was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 2, 2012	Good article nominee	Not listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 27, 2010.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Paul Coe attempted to bring an aboriginal title class action claiming the entirety of Australia?

Australia: Law / Indigenous peoples High‑importance

	Australia portal Aboriginal title is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian law (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indigenous peoples of Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

New Zealand: Politics / Māori High‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the New Zealand politics task force (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Māori task force (assessed as High-importance).

Canada: British Columbia / Law High‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian law.

Indigenous peoples of North America Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge Suggestion

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'm suggesting that this be merged as a section within native title or else be sufficiently expanded and referenced. Kevin Smith 04:11, 15 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

"The Crown"

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"The Crown" has no meaning in the United States. After reading "...aboriginal title is inalienable, except to The Crown..." in the introduction, I was surprised to find that the United States is included in this article. Later in the article, a parenthesis is added indicating that "The Crown" and "the federal government" are equivalent terms in this context, so I am going to add a similar parenthesis to the introduction to spare other readers the same surprise I got.--Jim10701 (talk) 21:57, 30 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

first sentence

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I got an edit conflict with my first sentence:

Aboriginal title is a common law doctrine that allows indigenous peoples to retain customary ownership of their land after colonial settlement has assumed sovereignty.

Not ok? Change "ownership" to "customary use"?

Aboriginal title is a common law doctrine that allows indigenous peoples to retain customary use of their land after colonial settlement has assumed sovereignty.

MathewTownsend (talk) 19:33, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Some jurisdictions view it as less than property; some jurisdictions view it as more than use. Tenure fits all. Savidan 20:55, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Aboriginal title. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:45, 2 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Indigenous peoples in Northern Canada which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:31, 3 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

"Unceded land" redirects here

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"Unceded land" redirects here, but the term is used nowhere in the article. This needs to be remedied somehow (as the connection is not immediately apparent if you're not already familiar with the terminology of "unceded land" and "Aboriginal Title"), but I'm not sure of a good way to integrate it.Peace and Passion ☮ ("I'm listening....") 06:50, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic