Talk:A Walk in the Sun (short story)

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Not so hard?

edit

This story is given as an example of "Hard Science Fiction", but I find a small flaw in the story according to the plot summary...

(diameter of the moon * pi) / (29.5 hours) = 102.791018 m / s

which is hardly a walking pace... is this really an example of "Foam Science Fiction"?

--Leav (talk) 22:29, 7 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Trish didn't have to walk all the way around the Moon in 29.5 hours, but in approximately 29.5 Earth days, so her average speed had to be only a 24th of that, i.e. about 4.28 m/s. Splibubay (talk) 10:41, 19 May 2010 (UTC)Reply


also i am not sure if it was around the equator was it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.105.62.2 (talk) 20:12, 7 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on A Walk in the Sun (short story). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:04, 1 October 2016 (UTC)Reply