Talk:A Championship

Image copyright problem with Image:FAIEircomLOI.PNG

The image Image:FAIEircomLOI.PNG is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:51, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Sponsorship Name - Proposed Move

I propose the move of this Article to "A Championship", as the use of sponsorship names is discouraged. While the Premier League is sponsored by Barclays, it is still referred to as Premier League on Wikipedia. If no one objects to this move, I will do it myself. GauchoDude (talk) 08:49, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Fire away. Fionnsci (talk) 13:41, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Intended to do this a while ago. Go ahead GauchoDude. Onetonycousins (talk) 01:41, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Whoops, apparently needed to do the following:

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was page moved.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:25, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

---

Newstalk A Championship → A Championship — Requesting the move of Newstalk A Championship to A Championship to discourage use of sponsorship names, following such leagues/examples as Conference South (Blue Square South) and Football League Championship (Coca-Cola Football League Championship) among others. GauchoDude (talk) 23:21, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - Uniformity is not a good reason to remove it, because there is no uniformity elsewhere. There are many examples where we don't use the sponsors' name, but there are also many where we do - see this post. The claim that there is a universal ban on sponsors' names is a myth. There may be other reasons to remove the sponsor in this case, but lets hear them first. Knepflerle (talk) 10:32, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Support - Uniformity is definitely not the case, however the fact that while the competition may not change from year to year, it's entirely possible that the sponsor of said competition could. In this particular case, the competition is the "A Championship" which happens to be currently, and incidentally, sponsored by Newstalk. The competitions I have mentioned above have gone through numerous sponsorship changes (Gola, GM, Nationwide, Blue Square), but are no longer known by their sponsorship names. Instead, they are known by the common denominator name of "Football Conference", while the other stuff redirects. Many of the competitions you posted in your link, such as the Emirates Cup, Umbro Cup, Danone Nations Cup, VTV-T&T Cup, Vodacom Challenge, Setanta Sports Cup, etc., were created in conjunction with the sponsor, have held the same sponsor throughout, or are a dead competition with the first two ticked and it was the only name it was known by. Either way, it seems like you're speculating Newstalk with forever remain the sponsor or it will collapse with Newstalk as its only sponsor, where as I'm speculating that the sponsorship will change. Needless to say, I'm probably going to stick with my side and you'll stick with your side so we're at an impasse (although the others above agree with me).

Support - The article was originally 'A Championship' and there was no discussion needed back then to change it to 'Newstalk A Championship'. I understand that there is no need for uniformity on this issue on wikipedia though in this particular case, 'A Championship' is my preference. Fionnsci (talk) 00:19, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Is the A Championship in the League of Ireland?

• I noticed there is some bickering about this. To be completely pedantic, it doesn't seem to be. The link [[1]] states "to act as a pathway for players and clubs into the League of Ireland", which would indicate the A Championship isn't in the League of Ireland. It's definitely the third tier of football in Ireland, sitting below the First Division and it's also administered by the FAI, but it doesn't seem to be part of the LoI.

TheMightyPeanut (talk) 07:58, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

• It's not, no. That's why this article exists [[2]]. If it was then there would be no need for such an article as the League of Ireland article would satisfy requirements. Fionnsci (talk) 21:52, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
• How to distinguish "Championship named after the letter A" from "a championship"? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:40, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

It is always referred to as "the A Championship" or if not "the Newstalk A Championship. Not a problem at all as I see it! Fionnsci (talk) 16:24, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on A Championship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160305195214/http://rsssf.com/tablesi/ier09.html to http://www.rsssf.com/tablesi/ier09.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160305195214/http://rsssf.com/tablesi/ier09.html to http://www.rsssf.com/tablesi/ier09.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160305195214/http://rsssf.com/tablesi/ier09.html to http://www.rsssf.com/tablesi/ier09.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:28, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on A Championship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100408121257/http://www.rte.ie/sport/soccer/2009/0323/soccer.html to http://www.rte.ie/sport/soccer/2009/0323/soccer.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100408121257/http://www.rte.ie/sport/soccer/2009/0323/soccer.html to http://www.rte.ie/sport/soccer/2009/0323/soccer.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:21, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on A Championship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160427041046/http://www.extratime.ie/newsdesk/articles/1708/ to http://www.extratime.ie/newsdesk/articles/1708/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)